Saxon v. Lashbrook’s Empirical Analysis
873 F.3d 982 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Cullen v. Pinholster · Cullen v. Pinholster · Cullen v. Pinholster · 176 L. Ed. 2d 678 - Renico v. Lett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he state appellate court determines whether any rational trier of fact could have found the evidence sufficient; ... a federal court may only overturn the appellate court's finding of sufficient evidence if it was objectively unreasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maier v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.