State v. Harry’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2025
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Superintendent of Insurance of State of New York v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company · Arrington v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. · State v. Larsen · State v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(elven i#f ... trial counsel forgot to deliver an opening statement, we would still conclude that such failure did not prejudice [the defendant]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Kell v. State · State v. Strain“This court will not second-guess trial counsel's legitimate strategic choices, however flawed those choices might appear in retrospect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Strain“fell below an objective standard of reasonableness;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Strain
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.