People v. Dolan’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2021
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Richards · People v. James · People v. Wilson · People v. Stauffer · People v. Schindelar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“equally serious that the respondent took no steps to protect the legal interests of [his clients] as he was required to do by CRCP. 241.21, and then asserted before the district court and the grievance committee that he could take no action on [the clients'] behalf because of the order of suspension.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Swan · In Re C De Baca“the lawyer is subject to the jurisdiction of this court and the grievance committee for misconduct committed while the lawyer is suspended.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re C De Baca“intentionally or knowingly violates the terms of a prior disciplinary order and such violation causes injury or potential injury”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.