Quinn v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McClain v. State · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · Carr v. State · 381 So. 2d 983 - Jones v. State · 567 So. 2d 237 - Johnston v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State did in fact violate the motion in limine regarding the amount of money [Katina] Quinn had on her person by specifically questioning [Ellis] Brister about the matter. However, the record is devoid of any objection by Quinn when such question was asked of Bris-ter. Therefore!,] we find that an issue that is not properly brought to the attention of the trial court by appropriate timely objection is waived. The supreme court has repeatedly held that “if no contemporaneous objection is made, the error, if any, is waived.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.