State v. Harden’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 district · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128b of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Bryan v. United States · Hanlester Network v. Shalala · Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. Meadows
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“done by a person who is aware or should be aware of the nature of his or her conduct and that his or her conduct is substantially certain to cause the intended result.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“compliance with both federal and state regulations is a physical impossibility”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harden“Criminal penalties for acts involving Federal health care programs,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.