873 So. 2d 407 - Netherly v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · 491 So. 2d 543 - Daniels v. State · 710 So. 2d 543 - Remeta v. State · 804 So. 2d 433 - Netherly v. State · 731 So. 2d 762 - Norton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen a defendant has jail-time credit on a sentence that is to run concurrently with another sentence, the concurrent sentence must also reflect that credit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.