Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 873 SO2D 419 - Wilson v. State

Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 592 So. 2d 1190 - Mantle v. State · 853 So. 2d 1103 - Byrd v. State · 827 So. 2d 1073 - Boles v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]ecause the trial court could not have made a decision on whether [the defendant's] sentence should run concurrently or consecutively absent knowledge of the true status of his prior sentence . . ., we remand for a determination as to whether the [sentence] in this case is to run concurrent with or consecutive to the [prior sentence].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.