873 So. 2d 430 - Cashatt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

33 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[a] facial challenge to a -7- statute is more difficult than an 'as applied' challenge, because the challenger must establish that no set of circumstances exists under which the statute would be valid.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. STATE OF FLORIDA v. WILLIAM CRUMBLEY · 988 So. 2d 56 - Ogborn v. Zingale

2. “[t]he state has a compelling interest in protecting minors from being seduced to perform sexual acts, and no legitimate commerce is burdened by penalizing the transmission of harmful sexual material to known minors in order to seduce them.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Alangcas · 944 So. 2d 317 - Simmons v. State

3. “a statute is to be construed where fairly possible so as to avoid substantial constitutional questions”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Smith v. State · Dp v. Clg