Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 873 SO2D 460 - Leon County v. Gluesenkamp

Leon County v. Gluesenkamp’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council · W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers · Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. · First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where, after a contract is made, a party’s performance is made impracticable without his fault by the occurrence of an event the non-occurrence of which was a basic assumption on which the contract was made, his duty to render that performance is discharged, unless the language or the circumstances indicate the contrary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] party's contractual obligation is discharged when the party's performance of the contract is prevented by governmental order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.