873 So. 2d 471 - State v. Cyphers’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Parker v. Levy · Palmer v. City of Euclid · 654 So. 2d 911 - Leisure Resorts, Inc. v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc. · State v. Barnes · State v. De La Llana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nothing contained in this chapter shall be taken or construed as applicable to an arcade amusement center having amusement games or machines [1] which operate by means of the insertion of a coin and [2] which by application of skill may entitle the person playing or operating the game or machine to receive points or coupons which may be exchanged for merchandise only, excluding cash and alcoholic beverages, provided the cost value of the merchandise or prize awarded in exchange for such points or coupons does not exceed 75 cents on any game played.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the Legislature's use of only the term `coin' in section 849.161(1)(a)1., reflects an intent that only those machines that operate by use of a coin fall within the exception to the prohibition against slot machines.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]hen the legislature has used a term . . . in one section of the statute but omits it in another section of the same statute, we will not imply it where it has been excluded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.