Kinsler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · Montsdoca v. State · 774 So. 2d 649 - Beasley v. State · 753 So. 2d 9 - Zack v. State · 714 So. 2d 391 - Mahn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“One of the elements of the offense of Carjacking, [3] which must be proved beyond and to the exclusion of a reasonable doubt, is that the accused used force in the taking of the property of another. If the evidence shows that any force used by the defendant was done with the primary motive of committing some other offense and that the motive for the use of force was for a reason not associated with the taking of property, then the offense of Carjacking has not been proved and you must find the defendant not guilty of that charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.