873 So. 2d 565 - Walker v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) the trial judge may ask both parties or one party to submit a proposed final judgment; (2) if proposed final judgments are filed, each party should be given an opportunity to review the other party's proposed final judgment and make objections; (3) if only one party submits a proposed final judgment, there must be an opportunity for review and objections by the opposing party; and (4) prior to requesting proposed final judgments, the trial judge should, when possible, indicate on the record the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. M.D. v. Department of Children & Family Services · 924 So. 2d 827 - In Re TD

2. “We can conceive of no scenario when it would not be possible for the trial court to indicate its findings of fact and conclusions of law”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 892 So. 2d 531 - Rosenbloom v. Rosenbloom · 892 So. 2d 1125 - Pedersen v. Pedersen