Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation · 632 So. 2d 1377 - Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Deason · 236 So. 2d 108 - Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette · 639 So. 2d 1 - Reaves v. State · 865 So. 2d 1267 - Northup v. Acken
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[MJaterials lose their privileged status and are discoverable when they are intended to be used at trial. We have been given no indication, however, that the disputed materials here ... are reasonably expected or intended to be used at trial. If they are, we would of course agree that they are discoverable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.