McBride v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 1995
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. State · McBride v. State · Robinson v. State · Abbett v. State · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... any attempt to subject the error in this cause to a harm analysis would not be successful, for it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain with any degree of certainty the impact of the error on the jury. McBride v. State, 873 S.W.2d 115, 116 (Tex. App. — Amarillo 1994).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rey v. State“to determine whether the error is subject to a harm analysis_”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.