Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 874 F.2d 109 - Ring v. Estee Lauder, Inc.

Ring v. Estee Lauder, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

874 F.2d 109 · 1989

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
December 2000
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2000

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

120198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alfaro Motors, Inc. v. Ward · Murray v. National Broadcasting Co. · Downey v. General Foods Corp. · Affiliated Hospital Products, Inc. v. Merdel Game Manufacturing Co. · Frybarger v. International Business Machines Corp.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.