Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 874 F.2d 1483 - Futch v. Dugger

Futch v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis

874 F.2d 1483 · 1989

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
3
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably 118 Wash. 2d 876 - Matter of Personal Restraint of Rice (1992), Blanco v. Singletary (1991)

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

26019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Townsend v. Sain · Cupp v. Naughten · Henderson v. Kibbe · Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “at least a reasonable probability that a psychological evaluation would have revealed that he was incompetent to stand trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must be inflammatory or gruesome, and so critical that its introduction denied petitioner a fundamentally fair trial”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'whether the error, if any, was of such magnitude as to deny petitioner his right to a fair trial.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.