Buck v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
874 F.2d 1578 · 1989
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2000
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Sumner v. Mata · Baskett v. United States · Thomas v. Zant · Aiken v. Hyman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Unsubstantiated” means “not proved;” and the state trial court’s determination that the defendant’s allegations of discrimination were unsupported amounts to a finding of fact of no underrepresentation of blacks or women.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Simmons v. Blodgett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.