Traverso v. Penn’s Empirical Analysis
874 F.2d 209 · 1989
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Gilbertson v. Albright (2004), Simpson v. Rowan (1995)
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Deakins v. Monaghan · Haring v. Prosise · Selected Risks Insurance v. Dean · Hamlin v. Warren
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That the § 1983 claim at issue seeks not only injunctive and declarative relief but money damages as well does not preclude abstention as to the whole action. Under our decisions, the appropriate course is to abstain by staying proceedings on monetary as well as injunctive and declaratory claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an indirect habeas corpus challenge to the criminal conviction....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Perdue v. Bell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.