United States v. Daughtrey’s Empirical Analysis
874 F.2d 213 · 1989
Citation profile
545 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 950 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably United States v. Rusher (1992), United States v. Rodriguez De Varon (1999)
545 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 472 · 18 U.S.C. § 666 · 28 U.S.C. § 994
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 950 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall accept the findings of fact of the district court unless they are clearly erroneous and shall give due deference to the district court's application of the guidelines to the facts.”
39 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the standard moves closer to de novo review.”
23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“each participant’s individual acts and relative culpability against the elements of the offense of conviction.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.