Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 874 F.2d 594 - Ucc v. Herrick

Ucc v. Herrick’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2018

2 district · 4 state decisions

301989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. John Deere Co. · Smith v. Smith · Durham v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. · Peterson v. Safway Steel Scaffolds Co. of South Dakota · Zacher v. Budd Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) If the court as a matter of law finds the contract or any clause of the contract to have been unconscionable at the time it was made the court may refuse to enforce the contract, or it may enforce the remainder of the contract without the unconscionable clause, or it may so limit the application of any unconscionable clause as to avoid any unconscionable result. (2) When it is claimed or appears to the court that the contract or any clause thereof may be unconscionable the parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present evidence as to its commercial setting, purpose and effect to aid the court in making the determination.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Words or conduct relevant to the creation of an express warranty and words or conduct tending to negate or limit warranty shall be construed wherever reasonable as consistent with each other; but subject to the provisions of this chapter on parol or extrinsic evidence (§ 57A-2-202) negation or limitation is inoperative to the extent that such construction is unreasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “all possible evidence is already in the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.