Cottrell v. Alcon Laboratories’s Empirical Analysis
874 F.3d 154 · 2017
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Allen v. Wright · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) suffered an injury in fact, (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the defendant, and (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that financial or economic interests are 'legally protected interests' for purposes of the standing doctrine.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“financial harm is a classic and paradigmatic form of injury in fact,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.