Ganek v. Leibowitz’s Empirical Analysis
874 F.3d 73 · 2017
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Illinois v. Gates · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Mitchell v. Forsyth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“applies unless a plaintiff pleads facts showing (1) that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was 'clearly established' at the time of the challenged conduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Naumovski v. Norris“Indeed, the law is particularly tolerant with respect to the mens rea element of a crime on a probable cause showing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“consider a hypothetical corrected affidavit”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mara v. Rilling
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.