Hayes v. Harvey’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “In our view, through the 2000 amendment Congress intended to make clear that, following a valid opt-out, HUD could not force an assisted family to leave the unit and that the family's enhanced vouchers must be credited toward their rental obligations. ... But after a rental agreement naturally expires, so too do the attendant rental obligations. At that point, the statute goes silent. Nothing in its text explicitly or impliedly obligates property owners to continuously renew enhanced-voucher tenancies.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Hayes v. Harvey

2. “the majority ignores everything else-the plain language of the text, the context in which the language is used, the broader context of the overall statute, and the fact that Congress does not alter fundamental details of a regulatory scheme in vague terms. Indeed, had Congress meant to radically alter property rights in the way my colleagues do today, it would have done so clearly. What is”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Hayes v. Harvey

3. “during any period that the assisted family continues residing in the same project in which the family was residing on the date of the eligibility event for the project.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Hayes v. Harvey