Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 874 F.3d 983 - Socha v. Richardson

Socha v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

874 F.3d 983 · 2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Harrington v. Richter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Indeed, a prosecutor must share impeachment evidence with the defense even if the evidence partly inculpates the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “impeachment evidence is not material if it is 'merely cumulative.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.