Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 874 FSUPP 1072 - Sagan v. Apple Computer, Inc.

Sagan v. Apple Computer, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
April 2018
most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2018

2 district ·

80199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. · Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell · National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion for a more definite statement is proper only where the complaint is “so vague or ambiguous that the opposing party cannot respond, even with a simple denial, in good faith or without prejudice to himself.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]f a pleading is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, the party may move for a more definite statement before interposing a responsive pleading.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[m]otions for a more definite statement are viewed with disfavor and are rarely granted because of the minimal pleading requirements of the Federal Rules.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.