Scott v. Guardsmark Security’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2014
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12117 (§ 107 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp. · Mathews v. Weber · Mercury Coal & Coke, Inc. v. Mannesmann Pipe & Steel Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“required an employee to waive his or her federal protections,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reduce[d] the time limits to assert a federal cause of action”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.