Jaffe v. LSI Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1400 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1409
Relies on Hoffman v. Blaski · In re Genentech, Inc. · Parmalat Capital Finance Ltd. v. Bank of America Corp. · GTE Wireless, Inc. v. Qualcomm, Inc. · 425 F. Supp. 2d 325 - Neil Bros. Ltd. v. World Wide Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The interests of justice factor “encompasses public interest factors aimed at ‘systemic integrity and fairness,’ ” Byerson v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC, 467 F.Supp.2d 627, 635 (E.D.Va.2006) (quoting Samsung Elecs. Co. v. Rambus, Inc., 386 F.Supp.2d 708, 721 (E.D.Va.2008)), the most prominent elements of which are “judicial economy and the avoidance of inconsistent judgments.” Id. “Fairness is assessed by considering docket congestion, interest in having local controversies decided at home, knowledge of applicable law, unfairness in burdening forum citizens with jury duty, and interest in avoiding unnecessary conflicts of law.” Id. (citing Samsung, 386 F.Supp.2d at 721 n. 16).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.