¶1AFFIRMED. See Windom v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly S191, — So.2d -, 2004 WL 1057640 (Fla. May 6, 2004) (holding that in reviewing an order on a motion for post conviction relief, the trial court’s factual findings are to be given deference); see also Foster v. State, 810 So.2d 910 (Fla.2002) (holding that it is not necessary for a trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on claims raised in a post conviction motion that are facially invalid or conclusively refuted by the record).
874 So. 2d 1266
Eubanks v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 11, 2004
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-06-11
Relies on 810 So. 2d 910 - Foster v. State
Decided 2004-06-11