McVickers v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Henderson v. State (1997), Granados v. State (2002)
63 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Delaware v. Prouse · United States v. Matlock · McCray v. State of Illinois · Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(d) In the following proceedings these rules apply to the extent matters of evidence are not provided for in the statutes which govern procedure therein or in another court rule prescribed pursuant to statutory authority: [[Image here]] (4) Motions to suppress confessions, or to suppress illegally obtained evidence under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 38.23.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Benford v. State“Preliminary questions concerning the qualification of a person to be a witness, the existence of a privilege, or the admissibility of evidence shall be determined by the court, subject to the provisions of subdivision (b). In making its determination the court is not bound by the rules of evidence except those with respect to privileges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Granados v. State“); Tex.R. Evid. 104(a) (“Preliminary questions concerning ... the admissibility of evidence shall be determined by the court_ In making its determination the court is not bound by the rules of evidence except those with respect to privileges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ford v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.