Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2013
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 160 Tex. Crim. 471 - Gilderbloom v. State · Iness v. State · Jones v. State · Cherry v. State · Thrash v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the trial of a criminal case in a court of record, if the jury disagree as to the statement of any witness they may, upon applying to the court, have read to them from the court reporter's notes that part of such witness testimony or the particular point in dispute, and no other .... (emphasis added).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Howell v. State · DeGraff v. State“Contrary to [Flores v. State, 827 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.App. — Austin 1992, no pet.)], a request for testimony, -without more, is not an indication of implicit disagreement. To hold otherwise permits speculation in every case as to the possibility of disagreement. Just as plausibly, however, one can speculate that the jury as a whole or certain jurors might not remember the testimony and do not disagree with the recollection of other jurors. Under Art. 36.28 this is not a proper reason for reading testimony. Article 36.28 requires disagreement to be shown.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DeGraff v. State“The jury requests to hear the earlier requested testimony of Officer Ing (sic) and then retire for further deliberation. If the other testimony is needed, we will request it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DeGraff v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.