Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 875 F.2d 1429 - United States v. Eide

United States v. Eide’s Empirical Analysis

875 F.2d 1429 · 1989

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
5
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably United States v. Gonzalez-Sandoval (1990), United States v. Kim (2002)

24 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

27019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Hawaii District Court)

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1365 (Federal Anti-Tampering Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Colorado v. Connelly · Estelle v. Smith · California v. Beheler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Coercive police activity is a necessary predicate to the finding that a confession is not `voluntary' within the meaning of the due process clause.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a reasonable innocent person in such circumstances would conclude that after brief questioning he or she would not be free to leave.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “formal arrest or a restraint on freedom of movement of the degree associated with formal arrest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.