Vicks v. Bunnell’s Empirical Analysis
875 F.2d 258 · 1989
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2003
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Sandstrom v. Montana · Francis v. Franklin · Scharffe v. Perkins · 35 Cal. 3d 547 - People v. Beeman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the court must at least have the entire trial transcript”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Adams v. Holland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.