Warford v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
875 F.2d 671 · 1989
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2010
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Polaski v. Heckler · Gavin v. Heckler · McMillian v. Schweiker · Lovelace v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n individual is not disabled ... due to an inability to be hired for any particular job or specific hiring practices of employers. Rather, the test is whether the particular job is within the claimant's physical and mental capabilities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Glassman v. Sullivan“A medical condition that can be controlled by treatment is not disabling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wells v. Sullivan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.