Jeske v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis
875 F.2d 71 · 1989
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Arnold v. Arnold Corporation--Printed Communications for Business, Snowden v. Checkpoint Check Cashing (2002)
28 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77L (§ 12 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 15 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · Wilko v. Swan · Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon · Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any controversy arising out of or relating to”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The amendment makes clear that we have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order refusing a stay pending arbitration or an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. However, we have no jurisdiction, absent certain exceptions not applicable here, to review an interlocutory order compelling arbitration or granting a stay pending arbitration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because the SEC has rescinded Rule 15c2-2, we reject Jeske's argument that that rule rendered the arbitration clause null and void.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.