Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 875 F.2d 76 - Anderson v. Stephens

Anderson v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis

875 F.2d 76 · 1989

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Harris v. Champion (1994), 29 Va. App. 119 - Rusty's Welding Service, Inc. v. Gibson (1999)

29 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

2601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 761 · 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (False Claims Act) · 7 U.S.C. § 1 (CFTC Reauthorization Act of 1995)

Relies on United States v. Armour & Co. · United States v. Dion · Torres v. Eastlick · Torres v. Eastlick · Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Mason City & Fort Dodge Railroad Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the inherent deference due a district court when it construes its own order”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the narrow issue of whether it was proper for the district court to rule that checks deposited in [an] account . . . after entry of [a] [] freeze order were to be included in the general account and distributed pro rata.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the purpose of the freeze order was to stop all activity of the [] account,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.