Myatt v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
875 F.2d 8 · 1989
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 25 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Lema v. United States (1993), Barrett v. United States (1992)
19 federal appellate · 25 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · Houltin v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“they are contradicted by the record, inherently incredible, or conclusions rather than statements of fact.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'it plainly appears from the face of the motion and any annexed exhibits and the prior proceedings in the case that [Corcoran] is not entitled to relief....'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.