In re Micron Technology, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
875 F.3d 1091 · 2017
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1400 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts · Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant's tactical wait-and-see bypassing of an opportunity to declare a desire for a different forum, where the course of proceedings might well have been altered by such a declaration.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]othing in this chapter shall impair the jurisdiction of a district court in any matter involving a party who does not interpose timely and sufficient objection to the venue.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in several cases involving venue objections based on TC Heartland that were presented close to trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.