Milby v. Templeton’s Empirical Analysis
875 F.3d 1229 · 2017
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 544 · 11 U.S.C. § 546 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Holmberg v. Armbrecht · Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Sergey Spitsyn v. Robert Moore, Warden · Gibbs v. Legrand · Luna v. Kernan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Socop-Gonzalez's 'stop-clock' holding remains the law in our circuit and applies here. That rule prohibits courts from constraining litigants to a judicially imposed filing window, and warns against imposing additional diligence requirements on recipients of equitable tolling. Courts may, however, consider a petitioner's diligence, after an extraordinary circumstance has been lifted, as one factor in a broader diligence assessment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.