Sylvia v. Wisler’s Empirical Analysis
875 F.3d 1307 · 2017
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Singleton v. Wulff · Lincoln Property Co. v. Roche · Robbins ex rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Human Services · Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“we are deprived of the benefit of vigorous adversarial testing of the issue, not to mention a reasoned district court decision on the subject.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“prior or contemporaneous ... understandings tending to vary the terms of the contract”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.