Hindel v. Husted’s Empirical Analysis
875 F.3d 344 · 2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12134 (§ 204 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1973F (§ 8 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 52 U.S.C. § 20301
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Burson v. Freeman · Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For purposes of a motion for judgment on the pleadings, all well-pleaded material allegations of the pleadings of the opposing party must be taken as true, and the motion may be granted only if the moving party is nevertheless clearly entitled to judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“After the pleadings are closed-but early enough not to delay trial-a party may move for judgment on the pleadings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.