Waggoner v. Barclays PLC’s Empirical Analysis
875 F.3d 79 · 2017
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2025
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp. · Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. · Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich Collieries
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). ( See id. ¶ 4.) Dark pools like LX permit investors to trade securities in a largely anonymous manner. ( See id. ) To address concerns that high-frequency traders may have been”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he Affiliated Ute presumption does not apply to earlier misrepresentations made more misleading by subsequent omissions, or to what has been described as 'half-truths,' nor does it apply to misstatements whose only omission is the truth that the statement misrepresents.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“no positive statements exist ... reliance as a practical matter is impossible to prove.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.