Yeoman v. Pollard’s Empirical Analysis
875 F.3d 832 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Rose v. Lundy · Darr v. Burford · Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · Rhines v. Weber · Woodford Warden v. Garceau
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“abusive litigation tactics or intentional delay”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sena v. Kenneway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.