Miscovich v. Tryck’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2019
1 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 30 U.S.C. § 28 · 43 U.S.C. § 1744
Relies on Southern Pac Co v. Bogert · Massiah v. United States · Huggins v. Raines · Guin v. Ha · Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula Borough
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well established that a party's failure to designate portions of the record that are necessary to allow the determination of a point on appeal will amount to a waiver or abandonment of that point.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“if the actor’s conduct 'evidences an intention to waive a right, or ... [if] neglect to insist upon the right results in prejudice to another party.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“issue of whether a waiver occurred is a question of fact; a trial court's finding will be set aside on review only if clearly erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Airoulofski v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.