In Re Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2021
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Meyer v. United States · Pettis v. Johnston · Nolan v. Nolan · Matter of Estate of Wallace · Sims v. McFadden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A. Except as otherwise provided in this title ... the following property shall be reserved to every person residing in the state, exempt from attachment or execution and every other species of forced sale for the payment of debts, except as herein provided. 1. The home of such person, provided that such home is the principal residence of such person ...””
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Klaus · Burrows v. Burrows“"Where one has a lien upon several things, and other persons have subordinate liens upon or interests in, some but not all of the same things, the person having the prior lien, if he can do so without the risk of loss to himself, or injustice to other persons, must resort to the property in the following order, on the demand of any party interested: 1. To the things upon which he has an exclusive lien; 2. To the things which are subject to the fewest subordinate liens; 3. In like manner inversely to the number of subordinate liens upon the same thing; and, 4. When several things are within one of the foregoing classes, and subject to the same number of liens, resort must be had,— (a) To the things which have not been transferred since the prior lien was created; (b) To the things which have been so transferred without a valuable consideration; and, (c) To the things which have been so transferred for a valuable consideration.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"Where a creditor is entitled to restore (sic) to each of several funds for the satisfaction of his claim, and another person has an interest in or is entitled as a creditor to resort to some but not all of them, the latter may require the former to seek satisfaction from those funds to which the latter has no such claim, so far as it can be done without impairing the right of the former to complete satisfaction, and without doing injustice to third persons."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.