Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

875 So. 2d 763

S.S.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-06-16

Decided 2004-06-16

PER CURIAM.

¶1As the State properly concedes, a written probation order must conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing. We thus reverse and remand for the limited purpose of correcting the written order of probation to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncements, which in this case means that the probation order should reflect that the curfew of 8:00 p.m. does not apply if the juvenile is working past that hour.

¶2Reversed and remanded.

/875/so2d/763 · .json · Public domain