875 So. 2d 887 - State ex rel. S.D.K.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]he court may find a history of perpetuating family violence if the court finds that one incident of family violence has resulted in serious bodily injury or the court finds more than one incident of family violence.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 246 So. 3d 851 - Hudson v. Strother · 929 So. 2d 865 - Slayton v. Slayton

2. “From a review of the Act as well as the case law, the apparent legislative intent in creating the Act was to protect victimized parties when domestic disputes arise in the course of separation and divorce.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 246 So. 3d 851 - Hudson v. Strother · 929 So. 2d 865 - Slayton v. Slayton

3. “was specifically designed to protect the child's interest by restricting the right of visitation of the abusing spouse in families with a history of family violence.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 246 So. 3d 851 - Hudson v. Strother · 929 So. 2d 865 - Slayton v. Slayton