875 So. 2d 918 - State v. Uloho’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 960 So. 2d 1105 - State v. Lagarde (2007), 958 So. 2d 61 - State v. Nguyen (2007)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 28 U.S.C. § 1739
Relies on State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · Jusino v. Brown · McKay v. Jobin · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“La.C.Cr.P. art. 774 defines the scope of argument and rebuttal as follows: The argument shall be confined to evidence admitted, to the lack of evidence, to conclusions of fact that the state or defendant may draw therefrom, and to the law applicable to the case. The argument shall not appeal to prejudice. The state’s rebuttal shall be confined to answering the argument of the defendant.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris · State v. Williams“[w]hoever commits the crime of armed robbery shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than ten years and for not more than ninety-nine years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.