875 So. 2d 962 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “after the judgment of conviction and sentence has become final”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Veals · State v. Washington

2. “Illustrations. By way of illustration only, and not by way of limitation, the following are examples of authentication or identification conforming with the requirements of this Article: * * * (2) Nonexpert opinion on handwriting. Nonexpert opinion as to the genuineness of handwriting, based upon familiarity not acquired for purposes of the litigation. (3) Comparison by trier or expert witness. Comparison by the trier of fact or by expert witnesses with specimens which have been authenticated.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 902 So. 2d 1061 - State v. Guillard

3. “The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 902 So. 2d 1061 - State v. Guillard