Lacy v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2018
1 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 114th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Indelicato v. United States · Bullock v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. · Simpson v. State · Crabb v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) it has no relationship to the crime; (2) it relates to conduct that is not in itself criminal; and (3) it forbids or requires conduct that is not reasonably related to the future criminality of the defendant or does not serve the statutory ends of probation.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Briseño v. State · Todd v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.