Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 876 F.2d 1451 - Fowler v. Bowen

Fowler v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

876 F.2d 1451 · 1989

Citation profile

109
cited by 109 later decisions
1
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 28 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 109 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably Doyal v. Barnhart (2003), Hackett v. Barnhart (2005)

33 federal appellate · 28 district · 2 state decisions

63019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 404 (§ 204 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Allen v. Califano · Broadbent v. Harris · Campbell v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] determination that [a claimant] is engaged in substantial gainful activity may be made solely on the basis of [the claimant's] earnings compared with the standards set forth in this regulation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “give great deference to the ALJ's determination of ... credibility.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.